Thursday, February 26, 2009

What are you most excited about in regards to your immersion experience? Why do you feel this way?

I am excited about being able to work on something that I know will be useful to the company. Also I think the fact that I get to just help out Qualcomm in general is exciting. I am also excited because this is my chance to show them tha I am also going to be I can produce excellent work. Show them what I can do. Another thing that I am excited about is that I get to be there for the release of a program that Qualcomm is releasing on March 13th. I am not so excited aboutworking for seven hours five days a week for two weeks! That doesn't sound pleasing to me.

2. What are you most concerned about (what causes the most stress) regarding immersion? Why do you feel this way?

I am just concerned about getting to much work and not being able to complete on time and with with high quality. But besides that I'm not really not worried about anything else because my mentor is extremely chill.


Thursday, February 19, 2009

Blog#35

How progressive was the progressive era

The progressive era was a very interesting time for America. It was progressive yet not progressive at the same time. There are two standards that I am comparing. In terms of business, the progressive era meet standards because of booming companies that were making millions of dollars. Now in terms of progressiveness in society, the progressive era failed.

The progressive era was probably one of the best booming business era's in history following right after the gilded age.. The progressive era was the birth of companies such as JP Moran, Standard Oil Company, Carnegie Steel factory, and Pullman Inc. These companies are what brought America into the new age.

Workers during the progressive era were treated very unfairly. Conditions in factories were horrid. Lets take for example the Triangle shirtwaist fire. About one hundred workers died because of unsafe work conditions. The doors in the factory were illegally locked and the workers had no way of getting out and had to jump out the window 9 stories above the ground.


The progressive era wasn't all
Things to consider (choose some, not all!):
* Constitutional Amendments?
* Workers & Working Conditions?
* Imperialism?
* Civil Liberties?
* Conservation?
* Democracy?
* Freedom?

Tuesday, February 17, 2009

Blog #34

Good Blogs

Economic Advice:
I chose Jacob's blog because he has very good advice that he gives to Barack Obama. He especially made a really good point when he started talking about college and how it should be cheaper. This is what he said exactly:"Lower the price of College and Universities, but make the requirements higher, so to support higher education on a lower budget. This will help the economy because it will make the workforce and the high ups more educated, which leads to better financial choices and hopefully some good innovation, something we lack and the Japanese exceed at (probably because of Saturday school)." That is an extremely good point.

Literary analysis:
I chose Diana's blog because her writing was extremely straight forward, and what she is explaining goes with the evidence she chose. She said: "Or what Nana said to Mariam when she was a child that “Like a compass needle that points north, a man’s accusing finger always finds a woman.” (page 7) That quote can be seen repeated all throughout the novel because of women segregation, and how they could always be found in blame no matter what the situation."

Historical writing:
I choes Aarons blog because of his sentence structure in his blog. He came up with a creative definition for what populism is. He said: "Populism, the response of countless years of farmers being put down whether it be from tariffs, agricultural price drops and loss of land." His creative sentence structure throughout his writing made the essay easy to follow.

Anything else:
I chose Willl's blog because when ever I read his writing, it is as if i am reading a college proffesors writing. His use of vocabulary is crazy, but it work. This is an example of his writing, once you read this you will be convinced that he is one of the best writers in 11th grade. He says: "As you can see above, this famous phrase from FDR's inauguration speech ("the only thing we have to fear...") is a cunning ploy intended to bolster the flagging hope of a nation teetering on the brink of financial collapse. While some may be able to unearth shreds of brilliance or prescience in the speeches of men and women faced with tribulation (like FDR, for instance), under closer inspection these uplifting words are revealed to be meaningless. A speech is nothing but a speech, intended to raise confidence in listeners where otherwise there would be only despair, in order for the speech-giver to garner support (obviously, anyone can give a speech, but I will narrow the field down to presidential speeches). You will be convinced of this by examining the purpose of speeches and their inherent un-trustability in the following paragraphs."

Anything else:

Monday, February 16, 2009

Blog# 33

Darwin was a famous scientist.... As humanities students (and humans), what responsibility do we have for the understanding of science?
We have a very big responsibility. If we don't understand science we cannot advance as a race. Science has been the key to a majority of our successes as human beings. With that being said, it is a necessity (of life) to understand science.


What role should scientific inquiry and scientific knowledge play in our own society? How should science influence our decisions, laws, and culture?

It should play a very big role in our society. Like I was discussing earlier, science is our life pretty much. By making new breakthroughs in science we can then establish new laws and decisions. As for culture, take my man George Washington Carver for example. By using science, he created over a hundred uses for a peanut. His concept of using everyday items for the better good is still implemeted in today's scientific studies.

Monday, February 9, 2009

Honors Blog

Presidential elections have been and always will be a battle between two parties, the Republicans and Democrats. The presidential election of 1896 dealt with a lot of issues, most of these issues derived from conflicting beliefs on populism, economics, and military ventures.

The populist party (also know as the peoples party) was founded by the people, for the people. The populists main goal was to give the power back "to the hands of the "plain people"." The populist were their own party, but some of them worked within the democractic party. in the election of 1896 the populists were at a crossroad, stuck between gold and silverites. One populist even said "if we fuse [with the Demorcrats] we are sunk." He then went on to say "if we dont fuse, all the silver men we have will leave us fore the more powerful Democrats. The populist party was going through a rough patch during the election.

During the election there was an issue with the gold standard and silverites which became a tedious task at hand for the presidential candidates. The gold standard was quickly referred to in the 1896 election as the "battle of the standards". The battle referred to was between the democrats and republicans. The republicans believed that gold was a "stable base" for business and prosperity among the economy. The republicans adopted an objective that called for "sound money" which was supported by gold. The republicans presidential candidate William McKinley supported this objective as well and he believed that high taxes would protect the American industry. The democratic party on the other hand believed in silverites which was a ""free and and independent" coinage of silver". They believed that by producing mass amounts of silver, it would increase prices and therefore revive the economy. Silverites also known as the "free silver movement" was not just a plan for the economy, but a "protest against region and class". The depression three years before in 1893 also had an effect on the election.

Military ventures played a big role in the 1896 election because both candidates were involved. William Jennings Bryan was an active member of the Anti-Imperialist League. This was Americas first citizen organization that challenged the governments foreign policies. The anti imperialist believed that "nations that sought to control colonial empires inevitably ended up embroiled in bloody wars far from their homes--wars that would eventually lead to the collapse of the empire." Bryan, a representative on behalf of the anti-imperialist argues the point that"imperialist actions are counterproductive for the sucess and health of the United States". He then goes on to make a very good point that "the extentsion of American power to foreign lands does not make snese financially, is illegal under American law and will invevitably lead to war".

Issues in society are what give America a need for a president. The issues that the the candidates faced weren't easy tasks, they would take knowledge and skill to complete them. Populism, economics, and military ventures both had two sides to them and they all played a role in the presidential election of 1896 whether it was good or bad.


Sources:

1.Nations of Nations (A Concise Narrative of the American Republic). Boston: Mcgraw-Hill College, 1999.

2.American Social Movements - The Antiwar Movement.Farmington Hills, MI: Randy Scherer, 2004.



Blog #32 Revised

Part One:
Dear Mr. Obama,

I have some questions and advice for you and your cabinet to try and impliment in you plans to fix the economy. My questions for you are:

Where exactly does that money go? We have spent billions of dollars for this war, but why can't we get that money back? Also with the economic crisis: who is at fault for this and exactly when were the first signs of this crisis? IF there is an answer, I want to know.

I have quite a few suggestions for you Mr. Obama. The first piece of advice would be to pull out of the Iraq war as soon as possible. The cost the war as of March 2008 was in the trillions! That is money that we could have been using to strengthen our economy and keep it stable. This war as earned itself a spot on the list of most costly wars, just behind Vietnam, WWII, and Korea. With all of that money, we could have prevented our current economic crisis. As of now, thousands of people are being layed off from their jobs everyday and the unemployment rate is 7% This crisis is almost as bad as the great stock market crash of 1929. I really am all for your plan to create about 3 million green jobs for American. That is very smart and everyone will be able to benefit from that. Another piece of advice that I have for you is to stimulate the economy by paying those who are being responsible in these economic times. There is all this talk about these bailouts and stimulus packages for companies that are failing, yet, there is no talk about rewarding those who are doing well. I think that in order to restore the economy to its full self we have to create new laws, and by this I mean in the area of lending and banking. One aspect of this crisis was subprime mortgage lending; lending to people who don't meet the requirements of the loan to be approved. A lot of banks and mortgage companies were subprime mortgage lending to people and that is how most of them ended up bankrupt. Some companies included Freddy Mac and Fannie May. The fall of the Lehman brothers was a huge deficit because a lot of other business went out of business. It is a domino effect, a sort of negative/reverse economic crisis.

Well this is all the advice that I can offer you, I hope that you will implement them in your further actions to reconstruct and build a stronger economy. Thank you for your time Mr. Obama,

Evan Lott


Sources

1. Bilmes, Linda J., and Joseph E. Stiglitz. "The Iraq War Will Cost Us $3 Trillion, and Much More - washingtonpost.com." washingtonpost.com - nation, world, technology and Washington area news and headlines. 13 Feb. 2009 .
2."More costly than 'the war to end all wars' | csmonitor.com." Google. 13 Feb. 2009 .
3. "Wall Street Crash of 1929 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia." Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. 13 Feb. 2009 .
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Part Two: Luke and I will interview our mentor on monday in her office at 1:30 and we will record it with my phone.

Sunday, February 8, 2009

BLog #32

Part One:
My only advice would be pull out of the Iraq war as soon as possible. The cost the war as of march 2008 was in the trillions! That is money that we could have been using to strengthen our economy and keep it stable. This war as earned itself a spot on the list of most costly wars, just behind Vietnam, WWII, and Korea. With all of that money, we could have prevented our current economic crisis. This crisis is almost as bad as the great stock market crash of 1929.

I also have a question with what I just said. My question is: Where exactly does that money go? We have spent billions of dollars for this war, but why can't we get that money back? Also with the economic crisis: who is at fault for this and exactly when were the first signs of this crisis? IF there is an answer, I want to know.

Part Two: Luke and I will interview our mentor on monday in her office at 1:30 and we will record it with my phone.

Tuesday, February 3, 2009

Interview Principles

Will and I thought of these three design principles for an interview with some examples of them.

Three design principles
1. Be polite (just like: http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2009/01/president-ob-10.html).
2. Keep digging if you get an unsatisfactory answer (just like: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xRkWebP2Q0Y).
3. Keep the victim on their toes (so they don’t know what question to expect next, leading to disorientation and thus better answers).(http://youtube.com/watch?v=9go38MgZ4w8)

Here is a link to Will's blog that goes into further detail about the principles.